我對此事再作補充一下。首先，之前和以下的言論全屬個人意見，如有錯誤請指出。

在此時最大要解決的問題始終是同學上課不專心和不專敬老師的問題。我先說不專心吧，盧析榆說得很好，「將心比己, 學生想老師在課堂上輕鬆點多點趣味,

但老師亦想學生留心點多點發問多點答問題,」我之前也提過，我覺得雙方都有錯，雙方都有責任要改善，說誰先誰後不太好，倒不如一起改變，一起讓步。

再說不專敬，鄭老師的教書方法令我在心中對她的印象明顯變差，專心認真的榜樣鄭老師肯定做不到，為甚麼那麼多同學會在態度上對其他老師，比鄭老師的差那麼遠?明顯其他老師和鄭老師必定有很大的分別才會構成這個問題。本來我對鄭老師是很專敬的，但因為她的態度影響了我對她的觀感，要「證明給學生看老師一個好榜樣」嗎?很簡單，改善自己教書惡劣的態度就可以了，同學對老師一直有一個厲害(叻)的榜樣，但正確的就......

之前沒有說自修的問題，我現在說一說自己的看法。

我記得麥sir說過他在大學有一科整年都不上課，只是到圖書館看關於那科的書，成績居然在有上課的人之上，大學可以這樣，但中學可不可以呢?鄭老師讀誦的技巧我從來沒有質疑，但我覺得她完全沒有達到教書的原意，教書絕不只是令學生得到好的分數(況且鄭老師連此點也做不到)，教書也要令學生學到

1.關於那一課題而課本沒有的知識

2.怎樣令知識運用和套用到日常生活或工作上

3.從有趣的例子中令學生更深入了解已學的內容

4.其他實用課外知識...

應該還有更多，但我記不起了，總之，自修是必要的，但教書也是一個必要的輔助，如果教書是不必要的，可以删減的項目的話，香港為何要設立九年免費教育?大可以強迫所有青少年看九年指定類別的書，中小學校全也可以改做自修室+藏書閣了。

我說完了，希望鄭老師能認真參考一下我的意見。

Dear Students,

After Tsui Hok Pan has posted his narration about certain events, so many negative comments on me have been released. I think this is very unfair to me because some students made their comments based on some false accusations.

In the E.P.A. lesson on May 18th, 2006, I gave feedback to 3D students on the common test paper. When a student asked about item no. 1 in Section B, I explained to them that if the “some” is added before the word “newspaper”, then it would be “True”. I also told them that this section is problematic. In that section, students were told to tell if the statements were true or false, but out of six items, four of them were statements of opinions. You cannot tell if these statements are true or false because they expressed opinions. You can say that you agree to them. You think they are correct. I said that I had discussed this with Miss Fung before the common test paper was printed. And I had not told them that I had discussed item no.1 in this section in particular with Miss Fung.

Later on that day, when Tsui Hok Pan asked Miss Fung about this. If Miss Fung really said that we had not discussed it, I think she was referring to item no.1 in particular. The paper was set a long time before the day when we checked the answers. So I think Miss Fung did not recall at that moment any discussion that happened before the setting of the paper. She just meant in these days, we did not discuss it. This was true. And it was also true that we discussed that section before the paper was printed.

In this matter, no one told any lies. Tsui Hok Pan was too sensitive to judge anyone telling lies.

Both Miss Fung and I understand how valuable each mark is for the students, so we decided to add one mark to those who made the right judgement for item no. 1 in Section B.

The matter has been settled and follow-up work has been or will be done. Every script has been or will be remarked because of that item.

I hope you can have more trust for your teachers.

Some students depicted a very poor picture of my lessons. This is not true. Most of the students have been very involved in the learning of E.P.A. I tried to encourage students to take more initiatives. Some students have really tried and participated actively. Of course, there are a few students who have low motivation.

If you have any opinions, please talk to me directly. I do not enjoy communication through the intranet.

Wish you success every day.

Your teacher,

Miss Dinah Cheng

大家一齊出價競投啦XDXDXD

http://hk.f2.page.auctions.yahoo.com/hk/auction/b4396132